SUCCESS STORY

The Game-Changing Potential of Cloud Hosting

Recent advancements in the public cloud space enable significant infrastructure cost savings. Although every hospital and health system is different, the potential for savings, modernization of infrastructure, and access to innovative technologies warrants serious consideration. Effectively analyzing cloud-based versus on-premises infrastructure options requires a disciplined and unbiased approach, deep knowledge of the cloud space, extensive experience with major platform vendors and their software, and strong relationships with cloud and supporting ancillary vendors.
technology 810 web

A large, prestigious health system wanted help determining a future infrastructure strategy for its enterprise software platform. Organization leadership was aware of recent technological innovations and expressed a desire to keep their infrastructure up to date in a cost-effective manner. The health system’s concern was mainly centered around its data centers and the ability to provide next-generation capabilities that perform and scale to meet future demand. 

Impact Advisors provided a comprehensive and unbiased evaluation of four hosting options for the health system: 1) on-premises, 2) software vendor hosted, 3) private hosted, and 4) public cloud hosted.

A Comprehensive, Impartial Analysis of Hosting Options

At the health system’s request, Impact Advisors approached the engagement as a research project. The team conducted a thorough, impartial analysis of four enterprise software platform hosting options to ensure an accurate “apples-to-apples” comparison that reflected the unique priorities and makeup of the health system.

Impact Advisors’ detailed analysis was based on:

  • In-depth interviews with key health system leaders and operational stakeholders related to the organization’s mindset, focus, and priorities for their platform software infrastructure.
  • Relevant documentation, such as data capacities, disaster recovery strategies, FTEs, and total cost of ownership (TCO).
  • Information collected from vendors, including hardware configuration and cloud solutions guides.
  • Impact Advisors’ deep experience and knowledge of hybrid cloud architecture strategies from previous projects, applying lessons learned to identify the specific evaluation criteria that would benefit the health system.
 
Extensive cost models and cross-comparison analyses were developed for each scenario to determine the best strategic fit for the organization. Impact Advisors produced a thorough report that clearly compared all four options, outlining the actual costs each would entail for the health system.

A Recipe For Success

This engagement underscores how Impact Advisors is distinctly qualified to help hospitals and health systems accurately evaluate enterprise software platform hosting options. Impact Advisors brought in a team with deep cloud infrastructure expertise and extensive knowledge of the software. The group had longstanding relationships with all of the vendors, which enabled effective and efficient collection of information needed for the analysis. Impact Advisors’ active collaboration with the executive sponsor at the health system was also critical to the project’s success, ensuring the team developed a framework and evaluation criteria that reflected the client’s unique priorities, needs, and current IT environment.

Positive Impact

Impact Advisors’ analysis supplied the health system with a clear and consumable assessment of the four hosting options. Because of the team’s disciplined approach, which impartially examined all four scenarios, Impact Advisors provided the client with a true “apples-to-apples” comparison that accurately accounted for the health system’s priorities, IT environment, and FTEs. Two options evaluated by Impact Advisors represented significant savings from the current enterprise platform infrastructure expenditure. Impact Advisors calculated that the most cost-effective option, cloud hosting, would save the client more than 40% over five years.

Strategic Comparison Summary

Chart for Hosting Case Study 20250910 vendor neutral