2022 PFS Proposed Rule Part 1: Traditional MIPS Program Proposals
This month, CMS released the 2022 Physician Fee Schedule (PFS) Proposed Rule, which also governs the Quality Payment Program (QPP) for healthcare providers. Check out our high-level overview here, read on for Part 1 covering Traditional MIPS Program Proposals, and watch for subsequent blogs diving into individual sections of the rule.
Traditional MIPS Program Proposals
New MIPS Eligible Clinicians (EC)
Two new EC categories will be added, beginning in PY 2022:
u25aa Clinical social workers
u25aa Certified nurse midwives
Note that Promoting Interoperability (PI) will be automatically reweighted for small practices (15 or fewer clinicians) and for clinical social workers (reweighted to 0%), although certified nurse midwives would not be reweighted.
This is likely to represent a significant challenge for these new EC types in 2022, as they’ll need to quickly get up to speed with MIPS and potentially have to incorporate workflow changes in order to optimize scoring.
Changes to Performance Thresholds
MIPS Performance Threshold
For the 2022 PY, the MIPS performance threshold will be set to the mean final score from the 2017 performance year (2019 payment year), which would result in a performance threshold of 75 points. This represents an increase of 15 points from the previous year’s threshold.
Additional Performance Threshold
An additional performance threshold would be established at 89 points. This is the 25th percentile of actual 2017 final scores above 75 points.
Note that the statute requires that an additional performance threshold be set at (1) the 25th percentile of the range of possible final scores above the performance threshold or (2) the 25th percentile of the actual final scores for MIPS eligible clinicians with final scores at or above the performance threshold with respect to a prior period (42 USC 1395w-4).
Exceptional Performance Bonus
The exceptional performance threshold concludes with the 2022 performance year (2024 payment year), making this the last year for the exceptional performance bonus.
As mentioned in our previous blog post, the transition to mean/median scoring represents a fundament shift in the metrics associated with MIPS in order to ensure budget neutrality for the program. What this means is that incentive dollars must be offset by (and funded from) penalties, with the result that providers are now essentially in direct competition with each other – if you’re not “better than average” you may find yourself penalized in order to help incentivize higher-scoring providers. Consequently, more providers may find themselves on the “wrong side” of the MIPS Performance Threshold.
For more on Budget Neutrality, please visit our blog post where we discuss this “Competition Curve” in more detail and its potential impacts on providers.
Performance Category Weights
As discussed earlier, the MIPS scoring Cost Component will be set to 30%, with a corresponding adjustment to the MIPS Quality component of 30% for the 2022 performance year (2024 payment year).
Note that the 2022 performance category weights are specified in statute and are not able to be modified without changing the original legislation.
Additional MIPS Scoring Category Weights for other programs include:
Note that these weights are proposed to have the same weights as last year (2021).
While there may be sound programmatic reasons for providing different scoring weights for the various programs, this does seem to add complexity for providers, as well as requiring additional costs for compliance for health systems in general.
Performance Category Proposals
Promoting Interoperability (PI) Performance Category
u25aa Apply automatic reweighting to clinical social workers and small practices.
u25aa Revise reporting requirements for the Public Health and Clinical Data Exchange objective to support public health agencies (PHAs) in future health threats as well as a long-term COVID-19 recovery.
– MIPS eligible clinicians must now report:
u2022 Immunization Registry Reporting
u2022 Electronic Case Reporting
u25aa Add a requirement in the Provide Patients Electronic Access to Their Health Information measure that patients have access to their health information indefinitely for encounters on or after January 1, 2016.
u25aa Require MIPS eligible clinicians to attest to conducting an annual assessment of the SAFER Guides (the High-Priority Guide of the Safety Assurance Factors for EHR Resilience Guides) beginning with the CY 2022 performance period.
u25aa Modify the Prevention of Information Blocking attestation statements to distinguish this from separate information blocking policies under the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC) requirements established in the 21st Century Cures Act final rule.
Quality Performance Category
Point Floor and Bonus Point Changes (for 2023 performance year)
u25aa For new measures, establish a 5-point floor for the first 2 performance periods
u25aa For measures WITH a benchmark, remove the 3-point floor [doesn’t apply to new measures in the first 2 performance periods]
u25aa For measures WITHOUT a benchmark, remove the 3-point floor [doesn’t apply to small practices, which would continue to earn 3 points, doesn’t apply to new measures in the first 2 performance periods]
u25aa For measures that don’t meet the case minimum, remove the 3-point floor [doesn’t apply to small practices, which would continue to earn 3 points, doesn’t apply to new measures in the first 2 performance periods, doesn’t apply to administrative claims measures (measures calculated from administrative claims are excluded from scoring if the case minimum is not met)]
u25aa High-Priority Bonus Points are removed for reporting additional outcome and high priority measures, beyond the 1 required.
u25aa End-to-End Electronic Reporting Bonus Points are removed
u25aa For scoring quality measures in the 2022 performance period, use performance period benchmarks from the 2022 performance period, or a different baseline period (such as 2019), pending analysis of the 2020 performance period data.
u25aa Extend the CMS Web Interface as a quality reporting option for the 2022 performance period for:
– Registered groups
– Virtual groups
– Other APM Entities
u25aa Updates to the quality measure inventory, resulting in a total of 195 quality measures proposed for the 2022 performance period.
u25aa Increase the data completeness requirement to 80% beginning with the 2023 performance period (maintaining the current completeness requirement at 70% for 2022).
Improvement Activities (IA) Performance Category
u25aa Addition of seven new improvement activities, 3 of which are related to promoting health equity.
u25aa Modification of 15 current improvement activities, 11 of which address health equity (and in some cases, specifically add requirements to address racial equity).
u25aa Removal of six previously adopted improvement activities.
In addition, CMS has specified eight criteria (two proposed, six existing) along with proposing six “optional factors” to be considered for nominating future new Improvement Activities.
Note that CMS is also implementing a mechanism to immediately suspend Improvement Activities if needed (for example if there are patient safety concerns).
Cost Performance Category
u25aa Addition of five new episode-based cost measures:
1) Melanoma Resection [procedural measure] – 10 minimum episodes
2) Colon and Rectal Resection [procedural measure] – 20 minimum episodes
3) Sepsis [acute inpatient measure] – 20 minimum episodes
4) Diabetes [chronic condition measure] – 20 minimum episodes
5) Asthma/Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) [chronic condition measure] – 20 minimum episodes
u25aa The Cost performance category will be reweighted to 0% for the 2020 performance year (CY 2022 payment year) due to complications of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Note that CMS is also requesting input on the process for future cost measure development.
CMS is proposing to continue doubling the complex patient bonus for the 2021 MIPS performance year (capped at 10 points that would be added to the final score) because of the concerns of the direct and indirect effects of the COVID-19 Public Health Emergency (PHE).
In addition, CMS is proposing additional scoring adjustments:
u25aa Revisions to the complex patient bonus scoring calculations
u25aa Revisions to facility-based measurement (for clinicians and groups)
u25aa Updates to the redistribution policies (reweighting) for small practices:
– If PI is reweighted, then: Quality = 40%; Cost = 30%; IA = 30%
– If both PI and Cost are reweighted, then: Quality = 50%; IA = 50%
u25aa As noted earlier above, beginning with the 2022 performance year, the performance threshold must be either the mean or median of the final scores for all MIPS eligible clinicians for a prior period.
– The performance threshold for 2022 is set to 75 points.
– The additional performance threshold for 2022 is set to 89 points for exceptional performance.
u25aa The final year for the MIPS adjustment for exceptional performance will be the 2022 performance year.
Care Compare (Public Reporting)
CMS is proposing to add affiliations for the following facility types on Care Compare:
1) Long-Term Care Hospitals
2) Inpatient Rehabilitation Facilities
3) Inpatient Psychiatric Facilities
4) Skilled Nursing Facilities
5) Home Health Agencies
7) End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) Facilities
Note that CMS is soliciting feedback on various components of Care Compare, including procedure volume, conditions treated, utilization data, HCPCS and diagnosis codes, data aggregation, peer comparisons, claim lookback timeframe, and other metrics to help patients categorize and understand data in a more meaningful way.
Additionally, CMS is proposing that subgroup scores be publicly reported separately from group scores (beginning with the 2024 performance year).
Up Next: 2022 PFS Proposed Rule Part 2: MIPS Value Pathways (MVPs) Proposals
CMS PFS Homepage:
CMS Proposed Rule Page:
PDF of Proposed Rule (1,747 pages):
Federal Register Proposed Rule Page:
CMS Fact Sheet: